How could I resist this HRworks (Pty) Ltd event focused on culture change—a cornerstone of effective employer branding and Employer Value Proposition (EVP) development? This morning's Networking Breakfast not only fueled engaging discussions but also showcased the vital role of culture in business transformation through a standout case study.
Today’s focus, ⭐️"From Silos & Red Tape to a Vibrant Ecosystem: Eduvos - A Case Study of Culture and Business Transformation," ⭐️was brilliantly presented by Kate Clayton and Nicola Graham, external Organizational Development (OD) consultants. They highlighted the transformative power of culture in organizational strategy through their work with Eduvos.
Key takeaways from their presentation include:
Read more: 💡HRworks Breakfast: Key Insights on Culture Change and Leadership⭐️
Expanding operations across borders is becoming the norm in the modern business landscape, but with this expansion comes the challenge of managing payroll on a global scale.
“It’s a complex and crucial task that involves navigating diverse regulations, juggling multiple currencies and ensuring accurate payments to employees worldwide," says Desmond Struwig, CEO of CRS Technologies.
“Without a comprehensive grasp of the legal and cultural issues involved, global payroll management can easily become overwhelming, but the right technology can provide valuable support in navigating these complexities.”
He cites several factors organisations need to consider when expanding internationally:
Read more: Navigating global payroll: Key considerations for seamless operations
HRworks (Pty) Ltd hosted The HR Network Breakfast on 17th May, co-hosted by Simply Financial Services. The event was a deep dive into Leadership and Well-being, led by the insightful Dr. Mavis Mazhura, Psy.D. Her thought-provoking presentation brought to light several critical issues affecting today's leaders and their teams.
My Key Takeaways:
Read more: 🌟 Insights from Today’s HRworks Network Breakfast on Leadership and Well-being 💛
By Rhys Evans, Managing Director at ALCO-Safe
17 April 2024
The growing prevalence of workplace drug testing has ignited a fiery debate, shifting the spotlight beyond the act of testing itself to examine the integrity of results and the fairness of disciplinary repercussions. This heightened awareness of individual rights and ethical considerations within the workplace highlights the critical need for reliable and equitable testing procedures, clearly grounded in a formal workplace policy. Driven by an understandable concern for the safety of employees and assets, companies feel compelled to conduct regular, stringent tests. Rightfully so, given that corporate responsibility is scrutinised relentlessly in today’s climate, which makes maintaining a drug-free environment so much more than just a compliance issue. It is now a necessary component in illustrating a fundamental commitment to providing a secure and productive work environment.
Emphasising the significance of transparency and awareness
Numerous factors are pushing companies to clamp down on the presence of intoxicating substances in the workplace. These include a growing awareness of the prevalence of drug use and its potential impact on safety, as well as increasing regulatory and legal consequences. Companies are becoming more mindful of potential legal liabilities arising from workplace accidents or incidents linked to substance use as more of these cases make news headlines. In response,
Read more: Beyond the test - ethical concerns spark debate on workplace drug testing
Section 23(1) of the Constitution of South Africa provides that “Everyone has the right to fair labour practices.”
This would mean that both employees and employers should have the right to fair labour practices and should be able to sue each other at the CCMA for breaching such rights. However, the Supreme Court of Appeal appears to disagree.
In the case of NEWU vs CCMA (2007, Vol.16 No. 11 CLL page 111) both the CCMA and the Labour Court had found that the CCMA does not have jurisdiction to hear a case brought by an employer for unfair treatment by an employee. The Court said: “…. It is not thought that employers need any protection against unfair resignations by employees. …. The majority of workers in this country are still ununionised and remain extremely vulnerable.” The Court concluded that legislation that would give the employer protection “… would be a step backwards in the field of labour relations and employment law in our country.”
In my view it is a very broad generalization to say that every employer is more powerful than its employees. Many employers are struggling to survive. And indeed, many employers are forced by economic weakness to close down.
Be that as it may, it is clear that the Courts are not prepared to uphold the employer’s Constitutional right to fair labour practice.
Read more: EMPLOYERS MUST LEARN TO WALK THE LABOUR LAW TIGHTROPE
Page 6 of 73
